Author interview - Chris Brookmyre talks about his latest Jack Parlabane novel Want You Gone. Me, I just want more!
Our latest author interview on The Crime Warp is with Chris
Brookmyre, who has published a total of 22 books and ebooks since his first book, Quite
Ugly One Morning in 1996. His latest
novel Want You Gone is the final book in a Jack Parlabane trilogy that started
with Dead Girl Walking in 2015, followed a year later by Black Widow, which won
the McIlvanney Prize.
R – Hello Chris, welcome to The Crime Warp. I’ve seen some reviews of Want You Gone,
which have described your latest book as a technothriller. Is that something you set out to write?
CB – No, I’d definitely shy away from calling it a
technothriller, that would be to really misunderstand what the book is about. There’s a perception that hacking or anything
to do with hacking is ultra-modern, but if you look at the books you’ve just referenced
– Dead Girl Walking and Black Widow, hacking is actually an old crime – if you
look at hacking – it’s not about computers and code it’s actually about
psychology, so I wouldn’t call it a technothriller
R – So, is Want You Gone a novel about technology, people,
or the way they come together? Buzzkill’s
real persona and circumstances are completely masked by her on line anonymity –
she’s essentially another person.
CB - One thing I found out is that hacking goes back to pre
computer days. There were proto hackers
at Harvard back in the 60’s, who were essentially pranksters. So there’s always a prank element to it, so Buzzkill
and her group they’re not really interested in doing anything particularly destructive,
it’s more mischievous, and its partly about the intellectual challenge of being
able to get in there. But I was interested
in this sort of dichotomy between people’s online persona and who they really
are. The great benefit of the internet
and social media is that anonymity – the Oscar Wilde principle, of “give a man
a mask and he will act himself” Anonymity allows people to behave quite appallingly!
I read a lot about Anonymous and LulzSec in particular and what struck me about
that in particular, is that people were quite shy and often in difficult
circumstances, so the personae that they were able to create online were like a
great escape, which is why Buzkill describes herself as a supervillain online
R – One of the best written scenes in the novel is the one
in the benefit office – I really experienced that awful feeling of helplessness
– the deck stacked against you and however well you’d psyche yourself up, you
know you’re on a loser. Is this based on
experience, and is there a message that you’re trying to get out with this?
CB - It wasn’t based on personal experience, but as a writer
I suppose you’re always trying to do is to imagine what the world looks like
for someone else’s point of view. Just I
suppose reading a lot about the realities of the benefit cuts and the
bureaucracy that’s been wrapped up in order to make it increasingly difficult
for people. I just wanted to convey that
this would be hard enough for anyone, but when there’s someone who’s had a lot more
responsibility thrust on their shoulders.
I suppose I also wanted to convey that she’s someone that’s not good at
confrontation, but is very very good at empathy and reading other people, and I
think that’s actually two sides of the same coin – she’s so empathetic, that it’s
hard to be confrontational. It’s like
that old joke that a liberal is someone whose too broad minded to take their own
side in an argument! Whereas in her case
she’s so good at imagining what the world looks like from someone else’s point
of view, it’s difficult for her to stand up for herself.
R - In the novel, one of the characters talks about
confidence tricksters – in Dead Girl Walking, you used the idea of the Spanish
Prisoner and in Want You Gone there’s another con trick within the novel. Are these start points for plot development,
your kind of lightbulb moment?
CB - I think in the case of Dead Girl Walking I did kind of
start with that. I had this notions that
I wanted to write about a rock band on the road, and if you’re writing crime
fiction you have to have a strong plot that runs all the way through it and it’s
good to know what the con is – it’s like when you have a joke and know what the
punchline is, you can put a lot of thought into how you build up to it and how you misdirect the
reader, so the big reveal has the maximum impact, so in the case of Dead Girl Walking,
I did come up with what the con was first and the book was predicated on a deception
– you’re trying to deceive the reader, so you’re always looking to misdirect
them, to manipulate them, so you have to start with the ending or at least know
what that ending will reveal. But I don’t
have it all mapped out in detail – the story has to tell itself, otherwise the danger
is that that the characters seem like they’re on a kind of rail.
R – Want You Gone reflects a huge amount
of change that’s going on – you see this in Parlabane trying to get a job with
Broadwave, which feels almost alien to him.
Do you think lots of people are being left behind by this kind of change?
CB – I think in
Parlabane’s case specifically, he’s in his 40’s and seen an industry completely
change around him. So at that point you’ve
got two options – you can either go off in a huff about it all, and be left
behind, or embrace it, and he’s kind of embraced it – and actually he’s seen
that there were a lot of things that
were detestable about the way the media was run, so he’s concerned about being
left behind, but if you’ve got the right attitude, you can embrace change and
one of the things that inspired that was
when I was working in newspapers, 20 - 25 years ago and the advent of desktop
publishing that were being introduced, there were people who had been working there since the 50’s and
60’s, getting to the end of their working lives, but they were the ones who
embraced the new technology the most, so I thought if that’s your attitude to
the industry you’re in, you’ll stay young.
I wanted to show that the media is changing, but just because it is
changing, it doesn’t mean that it’s for better or worse, so I just wanted to reflect
that someone like Parlabane represents a kind of old school journalism, but the
principles that have served him well, will continue to serve him well in the new
environment – the ability to cultivate contacts
and find a good story, that’s crucial – so he realises early on that whilst
Broadwave has lots of bells and whistles in reporting the news, they’re lacking
the ability to get and break stories. So, I suppose it’s a way of saying that
the technology might change but the principles stay the same. And the importance of those principles has
been bought to the fore now with the illustration of where people are not particular about the sources
of the news you’re getting, what we’ve seen over the past year with the proliferation
of fake news and unsourced stories, so actually, the more access people have to
new media, the more important it is that we stand by the principles of the old
media, which is about being able to stand up a story with good sources
R – Buzkill said “Friends
don’t keep score” in previous novels.
When did you decide that there was going to be some kind of reckoning?
CB – Kind of always –
actually, that’s why I had that phrase come back, because I thought that deep
down Parlabane must know that someone who keeps telling you that friends don’t
keep score, is actually keeping score.
After I’d written Dead Girl Walking, I wrote the outlines for Black Widow
and Want You Gone, so I knew that the third book in this series was going to be
all about Buzzkill, which is why Buzzkill does turn up in Black Widow, and the ebook/novella
The Last Day of Christmas, which is what introduces Buzzkill, so I could see
the whole cycle starting with The Last
Day of Christmas and concluding with Want You Gone, so I did always know there
was going to be a Faustian price to pay – the more Parlabane goes to the “bank
of Buzzkill”, the more he knows he’s going to end up with a heavy price
exacted! It’s also experience of
thinking a couple of books ahead – in the past I’d never think beyond the book
I was writing, maybe the experience of the Jasmine Sharp trilogy, which was
conceived as one big story spread over three books – that helped me think of
what I could do with this as an ongoing story.
At the end of Dead Girl Walking there was an idea that Parlabane might
be offered a job with the security services and other ideas that I might
develop, but they were overtaken by the hacking idea, which is why I didn't pursue
that.
R – I’ve seen on
Amazon that there’s an international version of Want You Gone called The Last
Hack. Do international sales influence
the way you write?
CB – I don’t think
beyond telling the story – the story is what works for me – if I have a
theoretical reader, it’s just me. I
think you’d go insane trying to develop a different story for different markets
and the implications of how it would play for different markets. In the case of the American edition, that was
interesting because titles are a big issue these days, publishing is far more
micromanaging when to comes to titles, covers and things like that. There’s a perception in the UK that you don’t
want to advertise that a book is all about computers and hacking, where people
might be put off by it and get the wrong impression about what the book is, whereas
American publishers thought that the hacking side of it was the biggest sales angle,
because hacking is suddenly very big news again in the US, so where Want You
Gone is right for a domestic noir thriller title in the UK, the Americans didn’t
like it because they thought it didn’t tell you anything about the story and
they wanted it to say that this is about hacking! It’ll be interesting to see how that plays out
and whether they’re right about it. I
was on TV recently in Scotland and that was because of the hacking side of it,
so the hacking element is going to be quite timely, but in terms of attracting readers,
I wanted an emotionally gripping story, because at its heart, that’s what it’s
about. It’s about a vulnerable young
woman that’s discovering her true strength and that journey - I also didn’t
want it to be just Parlabane helping because he’s a hero – it’s because he’s
trapped and angry, but realises that she’s not just a manipulative criminal,
but someone who desperately needs his help.
R – My closing
question is always about what’s next – more Parlabane? More Buzzkill? Or something completely
different?
CB – I’ve actually finished the next book – It’ll be out in
December and it’ll be a science fiction crime novel. So, it’s a crime novel set in space – a kind
of female buddy cop thriller set in space called Places in the Darkness. It’s about a space station, a massive facility
researching, testing and building an interstellar vehicle. It’s like a giant building site, so at one level
it’s supposed to be aspiring for the best of humanity and taking humanity
forward, it’s also a place full of people that have gone there to work, so it’s
quite isolated and a lot of bootlegging, prostitution and gangs running all
these things. So, it’s a very noirish thriller
– although it’s set in space there’s no aliens and laser guns – it’s down to
earth in term of its science – I had a blast with it because it was such a
change of genre – a chance to create my own world. It’s all done and will be out in December
this year. I’m hoping it will be the
first in a series, perhaps alternating between science fiction and Parlabane
novels – I’ve got the beginnings of the next Parlabane novel, but probably won’t
start writing that until August, but at this stage it’s way too early to say
what that’ll be.
R – Thank you Chris. I have ot say that I’m already looking forward to December and I’ll
keep Crime Warp readers posted with any news on Places in the Darkness as soon
as I know about it!
Romancrimeblogger
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. It will now be placed in a moderation queue for approval.