Author interview. A. N. Widdecombe (yes, that A. N. Widdecombe!) talks about her writing career, turning to crime and the merits of self-publishing.
Photo: Poppy Berry |
Today’s guest on The
Crime Warp is A. N. Widdecombe, former politician, part time dancer and fiction
writer. I only recently found out that
Ann was an author when her first foray into crime fiction, The Dancing
Detective, was published on Amazon in July this year. I thought Ann would be a perfect guest for
The Crime Warp and here she is!
So, welcome to The
Crime Warp Ann. My first questions are
about writing in general - how important is writing and when did you start
writing? What kind of things did you write about?
I always wanted to write and finished what I grandly
described as “my first book” when I was about nine or ten. In reality it was a
couple of exercise books stuck together. I also wrote a play which friends and
I used to act for the neighbours. By the time I was 18 I had produced a full-length
novel but I am glad I did not try to get it published as it was set in Ancient
Rome and I think the estate of Quo Vadis might have sued me for plagiarism!
I seriously thought that when I left University I would
write in my spare time and gradually reach publication standard but then
politics took over so thoroughly that all my spare hours were being poured into
building a political CV. All I produced between leaving Oxford and entering
Parliament were a dozen or so short stories and an unfinished novel.
It was even worse when I got into Parliament as it was still
the age of the all- night sitting. Thus it was not until I left ministerial
office in 1997 that I finally had the time to write properly.
Your first fiction
novel was The Clematis Tree, which makes me want to ask lots of questions - what
was it that made you decide to do a first novel? What was the inspiration? What writing
methods do you use? How did you find a
publisher?
One of the problems of having always wanted to write but not
doing so in a concentrated way until my fifties was that I had so many ideas in
my head it was difficult to decide which one to pluck out first. I was yearning
to write An Act of Treachery (about a French girl in love with a German
officer) but as it was set in Second World War France, I knew the research
would be huge and I also knew that not having written anything for a decade and
not having finished a novel since I was 18, I could not afford to be
side-tracked by research. Instead I had to focus on the writing. So I chose
instead an idea based on a contemporary theme - a family with a severely
handicapped child.
People often ask if The Clematis Tree was based on a family
I knew but it wasn’t. None of my books are based on actual situations, nor are
any characters based on real ones except Anton in The Dancing Detective. I work
entirely from imagination and for that reason I was quite apprehensive that
parents of children with disabilities might write and say “you haven’t a clue”
but instead I received so many letters asking how I could know so minutely what
it was like to be in that situation.
Indeed the greatest reward of my writing career has been to
receive appreciative letters about all the books. Father Figure provoked a raft
of correspondence from grandmothers whose sons and grandchildren were being
kept apart.
When I write I do not plot out a book in detail and never
know what will have happened by chapter such and such. I think of a situation,
introduce some characters to it and then I sit back and watch what happens so
much so that in three of my four general novels one of the central characters
has taken me by surprise at the end. Yet everywhere I go people tell me they
worked out what would happen. Well, it is more than I did!
I use a laptop and write as and when I can: on trains,
waiting for late night votes in the House when I was an MP, in my study looking
out over Dartmoor. There is no set pattern or set number of hours or pages. I
would probably be more productive were my schedule more organised!
I decided to write under my own name which was both a
blessing and a curse for on the one hand it made the book more interesting to
publishers but on the other was bound to provoke the usual “just cashing in on
the name” reaction. The latter effect diminished with each book I wrote and An
Act of Peace attracted very favourable reviews. I found a publisher, Weidenfeld
& Nicolson, through my agent, Caroline Dawnay, now of United Agents. She
was not at all sure she wanted to represent me until we met and we have been
firm friends ever since.
Could you talk about
the three novels following The Clematis Tree and how/why your writing took
off. How did you fit this in with an
active political career?
After
The Clematis Tree came An Act of Treachery, then Father Figure and next the sequel to the
second book called An Act of Peace. I
am working on the final one in the trilogy An
Act of Brotherhood and am both flattered and pressured by the number of
people who ask me where it is!
The
reviews at first fell into two quite distinct categories. Some critics reviewed
the book itself and those reviews were either favourable or mixed whereas
others concentrated on my having written it and were consistently unkind. Several mentioned the lack of explicit sex.
Yet many authors write without this (think Jeffrey Archer or Ruth Rendell for
example) and it is not a source of comment. It was only so with my work because
of my known views on moral issues.
Hilariously
one critic reviewing The Clematis Tree
bemoaned the family’s not being on benefit. It was, he wrote, a cop-out. Had it
not been a politician writing I doubt if the issue of social security would
even have occurred to him but again he was focussed on the author not the book.
The Clematis Tree reached number eight
and An Act of Treachery number 14 in
The Times best-seller lists and all four books are still in print years after
publication.
How different was it
writing your autobiography compared to fiction?
When
I retired I was keen to make progress on An
Act of Brotherhood but I had always wanted to write a detective novel and
while I was appearing on Strictly Come Dancing I suddenly had the idea of
basing one on a television dance competition so began instead to write The Dancing Detective but my publishers
were very keen for me to write an autobiography so everything else was put on
hold for that.
It
was a very different form of writing being my first foray into fact rather than
fiction, give or take an occasional political pamphlet or paper. I soon found
that memory can mislead and that it was necessary to check the dates and
sequences even of events burnt upon my mind. A further difficulty was knowing
how to pitch the tone and content given that I was writing for two completely
different readerships.
Those who were interested in the minutiae of the
Killingholme cargo Terminal Bill would probably never have heard of Anton Du
Beke! So I decided to give a flavour of a life which began in the days of
Empire, saw me at a strict convent school in the swinging sixties, then at two
universities and then finally on the road to Westminster before serving in
government and then as Shadow Home Secretary and finally retiring to Strictly,
pantomime and The Royal Opera House! Inevitably some grumble that there is too
much politics and some that there is too little but it sold well and, again, I
have received some wonderful letters.
So, turning to crime
and your novel The Dancing Detective - why did you choose to write a crime
novel? Was this easier or harder than
the other books? Why did you choose a
setting like "Strictly"?
Writing
a detective novel was a very different sort of challenge. As mentioned above I
do not plan my books out in advance but instead let the characters do as they
will. However one cannot write a detective novel without knowing who did it and
how and why because clues have to be laid and then suitably confused. It was a
much more confined way to write. However so far not one person has told me he
or she worked out “whodunnit” so it was worth the effort. My current thinking
is that I shall write a short series of six, all featuring the same detectives,
but not switch from general novels to
this genre and I am now back with An Act of Brotherhood as well as devising
the second detective novel (set on Dartmoor among the brooding tors I know so
well).
The Dancing Detective
hasn't been published through a mainstream publisher - why did you choose to self-publish? Can you talk about what you think are the
merits of self-publishing versus traditional publishing?
My editor, Alan
Samson of Orion, was enthusiastic when I told him that I was writing a
detective novel, but these days it is
the sales team which seems to decide the merits of a book and the Orion sales
department thought that, having published four novels and an autobiography, a
third strand of writing would be difficult to sell.
My agent began
talking to other publishers but by the time we had an offer I had resolved to
try publishing on Amazon, which is where The
Dancing Detective by A N
Widdecombe can now be found. Many authors are convinced that this is where the
future lies so from the point of view of the writer what are the advantages and
disadvantages? And should traditional booksellers and Amazon be looking at ways
of working together?
One of the biggest
pluses for any author is the sheer speed of publication. A traditional
publisher will take nine months from delivery of a book till publication but
one can put up a work on Amazon almost immediately. You also start
earning immediately with monthly royalties instead of getting paid twice a
year. The flipside of that is that there is no advance so during the period of
actual writing an author is working for nothing.
The royalties on
kindle at 70% are vastly higher than a publisher would ever write into a
contract, where the average paperback royalty is about 10%, but of course it is
70% of a much lower sum than the average book costs in a shop and
the paperback royalties paid by Amazon are not much different (about 12%).
Perhaps the biggest
drawback is the total lack of co-operation between Amazon and the bookseller or
event organiser. Most bookshops will stock an author's work for a few weeks
after publication and thereafter keep only limited stock so authors promote
their work at literary festivals and speaking engagements, selling and signing
at those events.
Event organisers buy
books at discounted prices from the publishers on a sale or return basis but
Amazon offers no such facility to either bookshop owner or event organiser.
Indeed authors themselves can receive a discount only if they are prepared to
pay postage from the United States which is where even UK books are printed. It
is cheaper to buy the book from Amazon as though one were a customer but that
leaves the shop or event without a profit and having to fund upfront costs.
Given that Amazon gains from every book sold, it must surely be missing a trick
here.
One huge advantage
in Amazon publishing is that the author is boss from day one because he or she
is the publisher and Amazon the distributor. So I had the glorious experience
of being able to say “Of course I want it available in America”! One can also
set one’s own price, change that price at any time and devise offers. You can
even promote the second book by offering the first one free with the purchase.
In exchange for exclusive distribution rights for a defined period Amazon also
throws in some promotion of its own but of course very big authors can always
rely on a lot of free marketing from their publishers in the conventional
world.
Finally, can you tell
us if you any other projects in the pipeline?
Will there be more criminal enterprises?
My current thinking
is to publish three detective novels this way and then to take a long look at
the results. It may be the best publishing decision I have ever made or the
worst but at least I am not sitting here waiting for the first book to appear
in nine months’ time.
Ann, thank you for appearing as our guest on
The Crime Warp. Fingers crossed for
success with The Dancing Detective and crime novels still to come.
Romancrimeblogger
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. It will now be placed in a moderation queue for approval.